Care, Uncertainty and Intergenerational Ethics by Christopher Groves (auth.)

By Christopher Groves (auth.)

Show description

Read Online or Download Care, Uncertainty and Intergenerational Ethics PDF

Similar social philosophy books


Positions is a set of 3 interviews with Jacques Derrida that light up and make extra available the advanced recommendations and phrases handled generally in such works as Writing and distinction and Dissemination . Derrida takes positions on his detractors, his supporters, and the 2 significant preoccupations of French highbrow lifestyles, Marxism and psychoanalysis.

Spinoza and Republicanism

Dutch republicanism represents a crucially very important context in which to debate Spinoza's political concept and his perception of politics. Spinoza and Republicanism presents an incredible account of his key political ideas, in addition to a clean and stimulating standpoint at the hyperlinks among Spinoza's political works and contemporaneous debate and traditions.

Ecology, Ethics, and the Future of Humanity

A e-book that mixes ethical and political philosophy with traditions of activism and literature in a historical past of clinical wisdom and interpretation to construct a accomplished photo of an ecological humanity.

Implicit bias and philosophy. Volume 2, Moral responsibility, structural injustice, and ethics

Most folk have implicit biases: they overview social teams in ways in which they're subconscious of or can't keep watch over, and that can run counter to their wakeful ideals and values. This quantity explores the topics of ethical accountability in implicit bias, structural injustice in society, and techniques for implicit angle switch.

Extra resources for Care, Uncertainty and Intergenerational Ethics

Sample text

184, n. 22) calls a ‘sociological description of the inhabitants of contemporary liberal democracies’ and what they desire in publicly justifiable policies. Although Rawls wants the set of primary goods to be independent of any ‘comprehensive theory’, they remain, then, derived from a kind of empirical observation. Similar uncertainties to those which surround the definition of the currency of distribution produced by needs theories (objective utilitarianism) therefore arise around Rawls’ account too.

Further, non-existence is not a problem: with respect to future generations, ‘[t]he identity of the owners of these interests is now necessarily obscure, bur the fact of their interest-ownership is crystal clear, and that is all that is necessary to certify the coherence of present talk about their rights’ (p. 65). However, another problem now presents itself. As Galen K. Pletcher (1981) has argued, once it is accepted that, whoever exists in the future, they will have certain interests, then harming these interests will be impermissible.

The SEV is therefore supported by an extra-economic framework of assumptions that establishes ‘consumer sovereignty’ as the central capacity of human beings, whose preferences originate with them alone (are endogenous) and who know unproblematically what they want (preferences are transparent). e. only individuals alive now, non-existent future people being unable to exercise this power) to dispose of earned income as they wish. The essential purpose of morality and law is, therefore, to maintain the entitlement of individuals to get what they want (de Shalit 2000, p.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.25 of 5 – based on 42 votes